If you’ve never read a book on the abortion issue, chances are there is much you don’t know about it. Read and learn so we can end legalized abortion murder. My book is available at Amazon in both paperback and Kindle versions.
We conservatives wring our hands in dismay as we view the decline in our nation and all its problems caused by the mistaken policies of liberals. We wonder what we can do. Some see protests in the streets as the way. But while protests may stir us up and may attract a few who wonder, “What’s going on?”, it seems to me that we must do something else. Most of us can’t go to DC or our state capitals and protest. Also, protests last only so long, and everyone eventually goes back home. We need something daily that we can all do.
What we must do is persuade others about how bad liberal policies are and what they are doing to our nation. We must persuade others in order to increase our numbers and thereby increase our power at the ballot box.
Persuading others to change their minds is a difficult task. We human beings seem to have a built-in resistance to change. That can be a good thing so we’re not easily persuaded by some smooth talker. It can be a bad thing when we stubbornly refuse to think and consider new information. Some minds are changed in a “eureka” moment, a sudden life-changing revelation that affects them immediately. However, I believe most are changed over a period of time by an accumulation of small effects. It may be true that even those who are seemingly suddenly changed in a dramatic moment were prepared for that change by an accumulation of small effects they didn’t realize was effecting them until that moment.
What I would encourage for my Facebook group (Conservatives Taking Back America), other social media situations, and for discussions with neighbors and friends is this: continue to present over a period of time small bits of information that will make them think again and again. They may not think but an instant, but it’s been put before them. They are constantly being brainwashed by the propaganda arm of the Abortion Party (the liberal media). We must be steady in presenting the other side. The steady dripping of water wears away stone.
On Facebook, for example, that means sharing things we see that point out the fallacies of liberalism and failures of Murdercrat politicians. That would include sharing news stories, memes, quotes, cartoons, and other items. We must be extremely careful, however, to avoid posting things that will destroy our credibility and give liberals an excuse to turn us off completely. Consider your sources carefully. Some blogs can’t be trusted. They write sensational stories just to get “hits” and earn ad money. We must post things from respected sources, not something one person is saying that probably isn’t true since others haven’t also said it. If it’s too good to be true, then it probably isn’t true. If it’s just the smoking gun we’ve been wanting to put some Murdercrat behind bars, it may be smoke and mirrors by someone seeking attention. Conspiracies theories loosely sown together with rotten thread and patched with spit and tissue paper aren’t going to convince anybody. They just make liberals mock us for being gullible. Wait until the thing is rock-solid proven. COVID stories, vaccine stories, and railing against Fauci won’t work to persuade liberals. They’re afraid and they’re not going to give up their fears of COVID by people saying there are problems with vaccines or that Fauci contradicts himself.
As I write this article, what will work are stories and reminders about high gas prices, soaring inflation, increasing crime. Some examples are: Murdercrat politicians contradicting their own words, bumbles and stumbles by Hiden Biden, ludicrous statements by blond joke replacement AOC, threats against our Constitution and the Supreme Court like a Murdercrat congressman just made, and many other things.
Learn the issues. Find the things that concern conservatives that also concern liberals (inflation) and keep drip, drip, dripping those things. Keep sharing to your timeline the things you think are best from our group and from other sources.
In a discussion with a religious person who votes for the Abortion Party, the woman objected when I made abortion the single issue that decides that voting for Murdercrats is wrong. She said I was being duplicitous (deceitful, two-faced). After all, she claimed that Donald Trump was a liar, a racist, a misogynist, and more. Thus, I must be, according to her way of thinking, whitewashing or endorsing Donald Trump’s record. On the other side of the coin, some would list character flaws of Hillary Clinton in 2016, I recall a previous election where a religious man said he wouldn’t vote for a candidate because he was an adulterer. Other candidates have been accused of philandering, lying, and using illegal drugs. Voters who believe the Bible will realize there won’t be a perfect candidate since we all sin (Rom.3:23).
What my religious friend didn’t realize is that there is a significant difference between voting for a person who is immoral or sinful, and voting for a policy that is immoral. A person who is committing adultery before being elected may or may not commit adultery after being elected. My vote does nothing to sustain that. But to vote for a party or person who will either enact or help an immoral policy to continue means I have lent my support to that policy. I have aided and abetted it. I have become an accessory. When people vote for the Murdercrats, their votes sustain the holocaust against the unborn, keep abortion legal, and they thus participate in the murder of the unborn. Again, if all those who say they are against abortion would vote only for the one party whose plank is against it, those votes alone would be enough in a few elections to result in an amendment to ban abortion.
…Consider the difference another way. Let’s suppose we have the choice between voting for a man who will lie egregiously ten times a day or voting for a candidate who will continue the murder of the unborn. Where is the greater evil – ten lies per day or 2500 unborn babies being murdered – poisoned, starved, crushed, ripped apart while alive? And if you say the former, I don’t think you get the picture. I think your eyes and heart are glazed over to the horrendous truth. Would you, could you, watch someone take a newborn kitten and cut off one leg, then another, and keep cutting away until it is completely butchered into fairly small pieces? Would you think that was just fine? If not, how can you ever think it is all right for a fetus of 16 weeks (a tiny baby about 4″ long) to have its leg cut off while it is living and trying to move away?
Those who were against Donald Trump and voted for abortion murder instead of voting for him and pretending be moral. They used Trump as an excuse to continue voting in a worldly and wicked manner, supporting the holocaust of the unborn in the United States which stands at 60,000,000 unborn babies murdered since 1973.
On the weekend of July 4th in 2018, Michelle Wolf did a salute to abortion in her comedy routine. That’s comparable to making jokes about rape or Nazi death camps. But, oblivious to the truth about abortion, Wolf made her jokes and the oblivious pro-choice crowd dutifully laughed.
Wolf said, “Some people say abortion is ‘killing a baby’. It’s not. It’s stopping a baby from happening.” Wolf, of course, is wrong. Consider the New York abortion bill passed in January of 2019. It allows an unborn child to be murdered any time before its birth. What is a 7 lb. 3 oz. human being one minute after birth? A baby. What is that child weighing 7 lb. 3 oz. one minute before birth? A baby. The only difference is its location.
But Wolf and other murderers will quibble. I’ll therefore use the language of science. A new human being exists at conception and abortion kills that human being.
Wolf made an error that is common among pro-murderers when she indicated that ending legalized abortion would be “catastrophic for reproductive rights.” But the woman and her partner reproduced at conception. Therefore, abortion has nothing to do with reproduction. Wolf and many other pro-murderers are wrong.
Wolf argued that there shouldn’t be any stigma against abortion because it is “super common”. Lying is super common, too, but that doesn’t make it right either. Rape may not be “super common” but it is certainly too common. And 400,000 rapes a year in the United States don’t make rape right either. Those who promote abortion murder always use false arguments since there are no good arguments for murder.
Wolf called “pro-life” a propaganda term, using a common pro-murder “argument”. She said, “If they were really ‘pro-life, they would be fighting hard for health care, child care, education, gun control, and protecting the environment.” It is a FACT that abortion on demand is murder of human beings. Wolf, however, moved into the area of OPINION with her statement. While virtually all agree that those things are necessary, it is a matter of opinion as to what degree they should be provided by government, how much is spent, who needs it, and who should get it. It is also a matter of opinion as to how to deal with the environment and to what degree. So to say that pro-life people don’t care about such things just because they differ in opinion with Wolf and others as to the “who” and “how” and “how much” is a faulty argument – again.
Wolf said, “Abortion is a woman’s right.” No, no one has the right to murder another human being. She said, “…women are equipped to do the most powerful thing in the world – give life.” Indeed, and women have been seen as special through the ages for that reason, and often glorified above men because of the wonder of pregnancy and giving birth. But the ability to “give life” does not include the right to take it. Murdering that human being is a perversion of femininity and a degradation of the exalted position where God has placed women.
Wolf said that abortion, instead of being a luxury that only some could afford, should “be on the dollar menu at McDonald’s”. Other who have so cheapened the life of human beings include Adolph Hitler and his Nazis, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao Tse Tung. Such is the level of wickedness and the company abortion murderers keep.
Wolf concluded with, “God bless abortions and god bless America!” Since God hates sin and is against murder, Wolf’s statement is the opposite of what God will do. The Bible says, “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil” (Isa.5:20). God will destroy this nation unless we repent of this horrible evil. Many who are religious are participants in it by voting for Murdercrats and thereby supporting and continuing the slaughter. For millions in America, religion in superficial in their lives and they have no understanding of the holiness of God and what His word says. Judgment is coming upon this nation unless we ban abortion.
Wolf quotes were found here:
Murdercrats, as they had done for almost two years since Trump’s election, showed their ugliness in the hearings for supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. “They’re treating him terribly,” lamented one woman as she watched the interrogation on television. Hired protestors went into the visitor’s gallery and shouted hateful obscenities, forcing Kavanaugh’s family to retreat from the hearing.
Murdercrat Cory Booker, senator from New Jersey and now a candidate for president, made a big show one day by releasing Kavanaugh emails once deemed confidential. He dared Republicans to bring charges against him. Those who know him well called it grandstanding, part of the circus Murdercrats conducted in the Kavanaugh hearings.
Booker declared in a tweet, “I will continue releasing so-called ‘committee confidential’ docs because it is important that American people see Kavanaugh’s entire record. No effort to intimidate me into silence will keep me from my moral & Constitutional duty.”
We can expect people who are so warped and hardened that they support murder (abortion) to lie and disobey the rules. Booker is no exception. Against Senate rules, he declared he would release confidential documents.
In Booker’s tweet, he declared it was his moral duty to do so.
Cory Booker’s boldness and bravado is simply for his ignorant voters. It takes 2/3 of the Senate to expel a member for breaking the rules. Republicans didn’t have a 2/3 majority and Murdercrat Senators certainly weren’t going to vote to get rid of their own. The Murdercrats in the FBI and DOJ exonerated Hillary Clinton. Murdercrats ignored all the lies and sexual misconduct of Bill Clinton in the White House.
Senators in Booker’s party wouldn’t even vote to expel him from the Senate if he was a murderer!
Wait! But he is a murder – guilty of supporting and continuing 2500 abortion murders each day.
And so are his fellow senators from his party and their voters.
Senator Corey Booker proudly proclaimed he was doing his MORAL duty. Instead, he’s a murderer and as IMMORAL and wicked as Adolph Hitler (along with other Murdercrat politicians and their voters).
………………………………………………………………………………………………………Dennis Lange
Near the beginning of 2019, several news sources began to report that abortion was the leading cause of death worldwide during 2018. Breitbart reported, “There were more deaths from abortion in 2018 than all deaths from cancer, malaria, HIV/AIDS, smoking, alcohol, and traffic accidents combined.”1
Snopes quickly ran a rebuttal.
The Snopes article stated that to make such a claim was a “political position, one which is at odds with the scientific/medical world. The medical community does not confer personhood upon fetuses that are not viable outside the womb….”2 That statement is simply false.
C.W. Kischer, who was a professor of anatomy and human embryology, made the sweeping statement, “Every human embryologist, worldwide, states that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization (conception)…. We exist as a continuum of human life, which begins at fertilization and continues until death.”3 Dr. Jerome LeJeune, who was a pediatrician and professor of genetics in Paris, testified before a Congressional subcommittee, saying, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being” and that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence…. Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”4 Since the definition of a person is a human being, science and medicine say that a human being, a person, comes into existence at conception. It is not pro-life people who are at odds with the scientific/medical world. It is pro-murder people who are anti-science and anti-medicine in this matter and it is the Snopes article that is taking a political position. Who does the article cite for support? Two sources were the United Nations’ WHO, a political organization, and also Guttmacher, which is a pro-murder organization, a political organization. Does anyone spot bias?
The article went on to list religion, philosophy, science, and other areas as giving no clear answer as to when “personhood begins”. It then quoted another article saying, “As scientists have peered into wombs with ultrasound and looked directly at sperm entering an egg, they’ve found that all the bright lines they thought existed dissolving.” That’s simply not true either. A scientist named Coy wrote in 2012, “The oviduct or Fallopian tube is the anatomical region where every new life begins in mammalian species. After a long journey, the spermatozoa meet the oocyte in the specific site of the oviduct named ampulla, and fertilization takes place.”5 If anything, the truth is exactly the opposite of the Snopes’ article. Science has simply piled evidence on top of evidence that humans come into existence at conception.
Let’s take a look at another part of the same sentence we just examined. Bethania Palma wrote, “Stating that abortion is the ‘leading cause of death’ worldwide (as opposed to a medical procedure) is a problematic pro-nouncement….” Here, the pro-murder piece seeks to cover up the true nature of abortion by speaking of it as if it were merely a medical procedure. This is a common practice by pro-murder advocates as they seek to conceal the truth. The truth is that abortion is a medical procedure wherein an unborn human being is deliberately killed to end a pregnancy. Palma, on Snopes, sought to take out what happens to the unborn child in abortion indicating that abortion was not a cause of death, but a medical procedure.
The Snopes article then went on to quote an article on Wired, which said, “When life begins is, of course, the central disagreement that fuels the controversy over abortion.” That’s totally false. Professor Hymie Gordon of the Mayo Clinic testified before a Senate committee in 1981, saying, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception” and “unequivocally, that the question when life begins is no longer a question for theological or philosophical dispute. It is an established fact that all life, including human life, begins at the moment of conception.”6
The article then quoted biologist Scott Gilbert as saying, “The entity created by fertilization is indeed a human embryo, and it has the potential to be human adult. Whether these facts are enough to accord it personhood is a question influenced by opinion, philosophy and theology, rather than by science.” What Palma does (and other pro-murder advocates frequently do) is a bit deceptive, shifting from one word or phrase to another as if they are the same. She wrote “…no definitive answers as to when personhood begins…” and then quoted as proof “When life begins” followed in the same quote by “when does a fetus become a person”.
Science does say that the life of a new human being begins at conception as already proven. Many similar quotes could be given that say the same thing. What’s a person? “A human being regarded as an individual,”7 says one dictionary. “A human, an individual,”8 says another. “A human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing,”9 says a third. A human being is a person and a person is a human being. Therefore, when science says that a human being comes into existence at conception, it is saying that a person has come into existence then.
By hurriedly posting this article to counter a claim about the number of abortion murders worldwide in 2018, Snopes showed its bias, lack of objectivity, and inaccuracy in an article so flawed. Ironically, on the same page as the article was this, “Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation….” I now wonder how much bias and misinformation is in the other articles they post in which they have a vested interest like they do in abortion.
Let the Snopes reader beware!
Dennis Lange
1 https://www.breitbart.com/health/2018/12/31/abortion-leading-cause-of-
death-in-2018-with-41-million-killed/
2 https://www.snopes.com/news/2019/01/03/abortion-leading-cause-of-
death/
3 Christine Watkins, editor The Ethics of Abortion (New York: Greenhaven
press, 2005). http://clinicquotes.com/embryologist-everyone-knows-life-
begins-at-conception/
4 http://www.epm.org/resources/2010/Mar/8/scientists-attest-life-
beginning-conception/Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to
Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session April 23-
24, 1981.
5 Coy et al., Roles of the oviduct in mammalian fertilization, REPRODUCTION
144(6):649 (Oct. 1, 2012).
6 Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary
Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981.
http://naapc.org/why-life-begins-at-conception/
Part was found above and part was found the book: The Life and Death
Debate: Moral Issues of Our Time by James Porter Moreland, Norman L.
Geisler, p.34,35.
7 https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/person
8 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/person
9 http://www.dictionary.com/browse/person
—
…..Even though I knew the story, I came home from watching the movie “Gosnell” somewhat shell-shocked and remained that way for hours. I found myself starting sentences like this, “I…uh…” and “Yes,…uh…” and being unable to finish. My emotions were in such turmoil that I couldn’t think clearly.
…..Kermit Gosnell was an abortionist who practiced his bloody trade for more than 30 years in his Philadelphia clinic. In 2011, it was raided by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies because of drug violations. Then, a horrible secret was discovered. The grand jury report said, “The clinic reeked of animal urine, courtesy of the cats that were allowed to roam (and defecate) freely. Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instru-ments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains. It was a baby charnel house.”1
…..Although Gosnell could have been tried for many more, he was only charged with, and tried for 7 counts of murder (along with many other violations of law including a third-degree murder charge regarding a patient who died). He was found guilty of three murders and much more, and sentenced to life in prison.
…..When Gosnell botched an abortion and the baby survived, he murdered the baby by snipping its spinal cord. Prosecutors wanted to try him for a hundred murders but the Philadelphia police department didn’t want their murder rate to be affected. A clinic worker who was also convicted of murder said that “there were nights when there were so many living babies born it was almost impossible to keep up with the pace of killing.”2
…..Abortion murder advocates would like us to believe that the Gosnell case was an anomaly, but in many ways it was not. It was part of abortion and the horrors of Gosnell’s clinic were caused by abortion.
…..Because of the absolute right to abortion that the bloody supreme court of 1973 gave in Roe vs. Wade and Doe vs. Bolton, health inspectors were forced into a hands-off position for a number of years until additional decisions were handed down. Edward King, a deputy director of the Chicago Medical Society, said in 1978, “The Courts very effectively knocked the Department of Health out of the picture. We’re not even entitled to cross the threshold of these clinics.”3 Abortion, as ordained by Roe vs. Wade, placed many women in danger in clinics that would not have met normal inspections if they had been allowed.
…..The movie reveals that abortion made the Gosnell situation possible in another way. Gosnell’s clinic went seventeen years without inspections because the governor of Pennsylvania ordered that no inspections be made “in order not to interfere with women’s reproductive rights.” In the movie, these words ring out, “Nobody wanted to say anything; nobody wanted to know.” The idea of abortion is so important that the health and well-being of the women who the “right” is for does not matter. Reproductive rights for women are more important than the women. This idea is not limited to that Pennsylvania governor. It’s fairly common.
…..The movie reveals another common aspect that abortion in general has with the Gosnell case. A woman who ran/worked another abortion clinic testified in the Gosnell trial. While being questioned by the defense attorney, she admitted that babies did survive abortion in her clinic as well. Some, she said, “Are out and breathing.” Gosnell would snip the spinal cords of such babies. What did the other clinic do? They gave them “comfort care.” Aren’t you glad that those babies were given comfort care? It sounds wonderful, but that means they were kept warm and comfortable and put aside, normally alone, while they struggled and gasped for air until they died. This again is common to abortion. This is part of the horror pro-choice people and Murdercrat voters continue and participate in by their votes and other support.
…..But there are some who also murder just as Gosnell did. One facility would take the babies and put them in water so they would drown. Three workers in another clinic reported that “babies were born daily and killed.”4
…..The movie also revealed that the liberal media, which supports abortion murder, is reluctant to report on anything that is negative about the abortion industry (as if 2500 abortion murders per day isn’t negative!). Because of the significance of the case, the sheer number of murders that Gosnell had committed and the horrors of his filthy abortion clinic, court officials set aside row after row of seats for the media. The movie shows the prosecutors driving to the court on the first day, being told how to respond to the mob of media that would immediately begin to crowd and question them when they got to the courthouse. “You’re going to be swarmed by reporters.” But none came. No one was on the courthouse steps waiting for them. The rows of seats that had been set aside in the courtroom were almost empty.
…..The movie shows one persistent reporter (Mollie Hemingway, I think) who chided the media and shamed it until they finally could duck the attention they were getting, and the liberal media came to court. The “New York Times” reporter came and stayed five minutes. Yes, you can certainly trust the liberal media to present the truth and give you all the important news – 5 minutes of reporting on the worst serial killer (of those born) in the history of the United States. Kermit Gosnell may have cut the spinal cords of hundreds of babies that had been born from his botched abortions but the media had to be forced to cover that huge story because it was linked to abortion murder that they support and help continue.
…..Abortion on demand is all about abortion and not women at all. It is abortion’s availability that matters, not the women who have them. In my book, Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers which is available at Amazon, I compare abortion to communism in that respect. “Gosnell” reveals the circumstances that allowed the abortionist who murdered in the womb and out of the womb to go on and on, harming numerous women on the way. But it didn’t really matter, did it, liberal media? It didn’t really matter, did it, abortion murder advocates?
…..How about you? Does it matter to you, or is your heart hardened by voting for abortion through votes for Murdercrats and then defending yourself with the absurd arguments that the murderers themselves have deceived you with? See the movie. If it doesn’t grip you, there’s simply no hope for you.
Dennis Lange
1 https://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Gosnell,%20Grand%20Jury%20
Report.pdf
2 https://townhall.com/columnists/phelimmcaleer/2018/10/18/nbc-abortion-fanatic-attacks-gosnell-movie-n2529707
3 Forsythe, Clarke D. Abuse Of Discretion (New York: Encounter Books,
2013), p.211.
4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fhyJItGPko
As I was passing by my television the other day, I heard Murdercrat Senator Dianne Feinstein of California interviewing supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and say something about abortion. So, I later took the time to listen to her words on YouTube because I knew she would say something wrong. All abortion murder advocates do. They lie, deceive, and use empty slogans and arguments.
Feinstein questioned Kavanaugh and revealed her ignorance of the issue, saying, “Do you agree with Justice O’Connor that a woman’s right to control her reproductive life impacts her ability to ‘participate equally in the economic and social life of the nation’?”1 Anyone, including O’Connor and Feinstein, who thinks that abortion controls reproduction, is completely wrong. One has ALREADY REPRODUCED when an abortion takes place. Abortion kills the human being that came into existence in that womb at conception.
Then, Feinstein made a gross error. She said, still addressing Kavanaugh, “In the 1950’s and 60’s, the two decades before Roe, deaths from illegal abortions in this country ran between 200,000 and 1.2 million. That’s according to the Guttmacher Institute. So a lot of women died in that period…. I don’t want to go back to those death tolls in this country.”2
…..If one knows the issue because he has studied it (because he cares), then he knows immediately that those figures are wrong. Feinstein made a horrible mistake that makes illegal abortion seem like a terrible killer of women that it never was. (Instead, it’s a terrible killer of their unborn children.)
Twenty years compose those two decades and the range in deaths per year using the erroneous figures she gave would mean that from 10,000 to 60,000 women died each year from illegal abortions. But even the lower figure is totally false.
Abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathan, one of the leading pro-abortion figures prior to Roe, writing in his book Aborting America about the number of women dying from illegal abortions, said, “How many deaths were we talking about when abortion was illegal? In N.A.R.A.L we generally emphasized the drama of the individual case, not the mass statistics, but when we spoke of the latter it was always ‘5,000 to 10,000 deaths a year.’ I confess that I knew the figures were false, and I suppose the others did too if they stopped to think of it. But in the ‘morality’ of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics? The overriding concern was to get the laws eliminated, and anything within reason that had to be done was permissible.”3 He admitted, “I was selling a bill of goods.”4
What is the truth? The truth is that Guttmacher does use the figures Feinstein gave for those two decades, but the figures are not for the number of deaths from abortions but for the number of illegal abortions. The Guttmacher site reads, “Estimates of the number of illegal abortions (emphasis mine – DL) in the 1950s and 1960s ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. One analysis, extrapolating from data from North Carolina, concluded that an estimated 829,000 illegal or self-induced abortions occurred in 1967.”5
About deaths from illegal abortions, Guttmacher went on to say in the same article, “One stark indication of the prevalence of illegal abortion was the death toll. In 1930, abortion was listed as the official cause of death for almost 2,700 women—nearly one-fifth (18%) of maternal deaths recorded in that year. The death toll had declined to just under 1,700 by 1940, and to just over 300 by 1950 (most likely because of the introduction of antibiotics in the 1940s, which permitted more effective treatment of the infections that frequently developed after illegal abortion). By 1965, the number of deaths due to illegal abortion had fallen to just under 200, but illegal abortion still accounted for 17% of all deaths attributed to pregnancy and childbirth that year. And these are just the number that were officially reported; the actual number was likely much higher.” Using the reported statistics from 1950 (just over 300), the deaths from illegal abortions during the 50’s and 60’s would have been closer to 6,000 instead of the 200,000 Feinstein gave.
A pro-murder Feinstein staffer doing research most likely made the mistake, but didn’t know enough about the issue to instantly recognize it. Pro-murder Senator Feinstein didn’t know enough about the issue so she continued the error. How many Senators listening to her didn’t know she had made a gigantic mistake? How many millions who heard her words on television or as I did more distinctly on YouTube not know she had made a mistake?
The problem in abortion murder is that people on both sides of the issue are ignorant about the issue. Countless millions have the same ignorance Freinstein revealed because they are so involved in watching movies, sports, soap operas, playing games, and pursuing their trivia in their lives that they don’t really care to learn about the issue of abortion which has resulted in the murder of 60,000,000 unborn babies since Roe vs. Wade in 1973 and continues at the rate of 2500 murders per day.
How about you? Are you going to learn the issue? If you’re pro-murder, you just might find out you’ve been duped. If you’re pro-life, perhaps you’ll discover the rock-solid basis for your stance. If you’re a politician who is supposedly pro-life, you would find out that the issue belongs to those who are pro-life and you can destroy the Murdercrats in elections by focusing on abortion murder and educating an unknowing public.
Read a book. Try mine – Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers, available at Amazon. When 2500 murders are occurring every day, there is too much at stake to be ignorant about the issue.
Dennis Lange
1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBK1iBT9Ofg
2 Ibid.
3 Nathanson, Bernard. Aborting America (Garden City, NY: Doubleday &
Company, Inc., 1979), p.193.
4 Ibid, p.161.
5 https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2003/03/lessons-roe-will-past-be-prologue
…
…..In my book Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers, I spent a chapter detailing how feminists, Murdercrats, and other abortion murder advocates are waging the War on Women (instead of Republicans). Included was information about the physical effects of abortion on women, ranging from immediate death to long term results like sterility, increased chances of breast cancer, and much more. I also laid out the proof of the emotional/psychological problems that trouble and even devastate many women because of their abortions. The proof of how widespread is the woe is given by mental health professionals who have counseled countless troubled women, and by polls where women admit their difficulties in coping with their abortions.
Recently, I saw comments by two people that provide anecdotal evidence of the suffering. I give them here not to prove widespread anguish, but to show the kind and depth of suffering some women endure after their abortion, contrary to pro-murder advocate lies that all is bliss.
The first comment was by a woman in a post on a pro-life Facebook group. She said something like this: “It’s been 45 years since my abortion and I still think of my daughter. I think about her at Christmas, on Mother’s Day, on her birthday (the due date – D.L.), on the anniversary of the abortion – how old she’d be, what she would look like, etc.” It’s obvious that taking the life of her unborn daughter has haunted that woman for 45 years, filling her with regret.
The second comment followed closely on the heels of the first and prompted me to write this article. A fellow poet, Australian Dennis O’Brien, wrote, “I know a woman who had an abortion at 16. She’s 39 now, and has had all sorts of mental issues – at least three suicide attempts.” Many psychiatrists know the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of women as they carry guilt with them, knowing for the rest of their lives they have done something terribly wrong.
It is a lie that abortion helps women. It destroys them. But just like communism is an idea that matters more than people, and so millions and millions have been killed so that the idea will go on, abortion in the mind of radical feminists is an idea more important than the millions of women who suffer terribly for the rest of their lives.*
Abortion is a scourge ruining our nation.
*If you suffer from guilt please read the post by that name along the top of this blog. You can be happy again.
Dennis Lange
—
…..People come in all shades of opinions concerning abortion murder, ranging from the far left and abortion on demand without apology to people on the other end of the spectrum who are certain abortion murder is wrong in every instance. In the middle are some really “nice” people whose stance is essentially “live and let live.”
These are the “wonderful” non-judgmental folks who say about abortion murderers, “That’s their choice. It’s up to them.” Live and let live means these terrifically “moral” people choose to let others murder the unborn if they wish while they themselves live out their lives. “I’ll do my thing while you abortion murderers go about doing your thing over there. Keep on murdering if you want to. I won’t hinder you in your life and you shouldn’t hinder me in my life. Live and let live.”
That sounds great if you like the Yankees and I like the Astros. But the abortion issue is about murder. The “live and let live” philosophy of not getting involved in other’s affairs, not butting in, not deciding that someone’s course of action is wrong and working to end it doesn’t sound so nice and swell regarding this issue.
When you know that someone “over there” is being murdered because you hear the screams such as those of Kitty Genovese, and you do nothing because your philosophy is live and let live, you have deliberately turned your back on evil and let it continue. You have sanctioned murder and allowed it to go on. Instead of helping to stop the murder and save a life, you were silent and continued on your selfish way. You are even worse than those who passed the robbed and beaten man on the road. Your moral kindred is not the “Good” Samaritan. There’s nothing good about you involving this issue.
The 2500 unborn babies a day being murdered in this nation by abortion aren’t screaming, but the fact of it screams in your ear. You know it and if your philosophy is “live and let live”, then you’re driving by Planned Murderhood and all the other murder rooms and letting the slaughter continue. You’ve given tacit approval. You’ve said that it’s the choice of those murderous people to kill the innocents in the womb when NO ONE has the right to choose to murder another. Your morals are in the sewer system along with theirs. You simply think you’re better than they are, that you’re above and untouched by it all, but you are complicit in the murders by neglect.
Your philosophy in this case is not “live and let live” (live your life and let others live theirs). Your philosophy concerning abortion is to live your life and let the slaughter go on. Your philosophy is “live and let die.”
Dennis Lange